Politicians approach court for power, not justice – ex-presidential candidate(Details)
In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s final verdict on the 2023 presidential election, Prince Adewole Adebayo, a former contestant from the Social Democratic Party (SDP), shares his perspectives on the political landscape and the role of the judiciary. In an interview with DAILY POST, Adebayo discusses a range of issues, emphasizing the tendency of politicians to seek power rather than justice through legal avenues.
Adebayo expresses concern over the prevailing attitude of politicians toward elections, highlighting the need for urgent electoral reforms. He suggests that winners should not be sworn into office until all court cases against them are concluded, aiming to eliminate any coloration of judgment perception. Reflecting on the duration of election petitions, he acknowledges room for improvement and advocates for a streamlined process that concludes before swearing-in ceremonies.
When asked about achieving cleaner elections, Adebayo identifies three key factors, with a significant emphasis on political responsibility. He stresses the importance of legal reforms, acknowledging the challenge of lawmakers being politicians themselves. Adebayo also delves into the efficiency of the judiciary, asserting that the court operates within the confines of the law and is not designed to provide power but rather justice.
Regarding the recent Supreme Court decision and allegations of emphasizing technicalities, Adebayo clarifies the nature of election matters, which he describes as inherently technical. He defends the court’s role in adhering to the claims presented and refutes claims of a lack of emphasis on substantive matters.
Adebayo responds to criticisms of the Supreme Court’s handling of the Chicago State University certificate issue, explaining the technical nature of election claims and the court’s limited jurisdiction. He asserts that even if admitted, the evidence would not have altered the outcome.
On retired Justice Musa Muhammed Datijo’s allegations, Adebayo acknowledges the concerns raised about administrative aspects of the judiciary. He suggests that the judiciary’s internal review of remuneration could address these issues.
Addressing the depletion of justices at the Supreme Court, Adebayo discusses the appointment process, emphasizing the president’s significant role. He suggests a gradual approach to opening the appointment process, starting with the Court of Appeal before implementing changes at the Supreme Court.
In conclusion, Adebayo advocates for a more liberal approach to leadership, urging a review of power and privilege concentration. He encourages collaborative efforts between the judiciary and the president in the appointment process, emphasizing transparency and a balanced representation from both the bench and the bar.
