Kano Emirate Crisis: Governor Yusuf Drops BOMBSHELL, Reveals SHOCKING Reason Behind Bayero’s Arrest; See Explosive Details
In response to Bala Ibrahim’ s scathing. critique titled A Rendezvous with Recklessness and Executive Rascality , Bature, speaking on behalf of Governor Abba Yusuf, vehemently defended the governor against allegations of recklessness and executive misconduct.
Recently, the Federal High Court in Kano ordered the state government to compensate Bayero with N10 million for infringing on his fundamental rights, personal liberty, and freedom of movement. This ruling, delivered by Justice Simon Amobeda, referenced Sections 35(1) and 41(1) of the 1999 Constitution, asserting that Yusuf’ s decision to order Bayero’s arrest lacked lawful justification and resulted in his house arrest due to fear of further detention.
Capitalizing on the court’s decision, Bala Ibrahim criticized Governor Yusuf for purported power abuse and rash decision-making, particularly citing the demolition of structures and issuance of Bayero’ s arrest warrant, actions that led to court-mandated compensations for affected parties.
Responding to Ibrahim’ s remarks, the governor’s spokesperson countered, questioning Ibrahim’ s comprehension of governmental operations. While refraining from discussing judicial rulings directly, the spokesperson emphasized the straightforward nature of the Kano Emirship issue under the new Kano Emirate Law (2024). This law, repealing the 2019 legislation, restored Kano to a single emirate, a move reflecting the populace’s desires.
Regarding the reinstallation of Emir Muhammadu Sanusi II, the spokesperson underscored that his dethronement and subsequent exile by Abdullahi Ganduje’ s administration stemmed from malice. Defending the arrest order against deposed Emir Aminu Bayero, the spokesperson argued it was necessary to safeguard public security, citing concerns over potential unrest following Bayero’ s return to Kano post- dethronement. Governor Yusuf, as the state’s Chief Security Officer, justified the demolition of buildings, characterizing it as an effort to reclaim unlawfully acquired public property by former Governor Ganduje and associates. He stressed the importance of preventing misuse of public funds and resources, despite criticism from figures like Bala Ibrahim.
In conclusion, Governor Yusuf reaffirmed his commitment to Kano state’ s welfare and socio-economic progress, despite ongoing dissent. His administration’s actions, he asserted, were driven by a dedication to public good and the preservation of order in the state.